On Tue, 28 Jun 2022 10:29:06 +0100 Neil Bowers <neilb@neilb.org> wrote: > > Next (meta)-question: Should this be turned into a full RFC, or is > > it small and concise enough that these questions and any subsequent > > discussion on a PR would be sufficient? > > I think this should go via an RFC. The idea is that changes to the > language should go through the RFC process, and the process should be > able to handle both heavy- and light-weight proposals. Alrighty. Now written at https://github.com/Perl/RFCs/pull/20 -- Paul "LeoNerd" Evans leonerd@leonerd.org.uk | https://metacpan.org/author/PEVANS http://www.leonerd.org.uk/ | https://www.tindie.com/stores/leonerd/Thread Previous | Thread Next