Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from June 2022
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next
> From: Tomasz Konojacki <me@xenu.pl>
> On Tue, 28 Jun 2022, at 06:30, Konovalov, Vadim wrote:
> > Usage of "?" in this context is obviously incorrect.
> > Not only you're messing with following search engines, you're also
> > applying wrong meaning to the umlaut.
> >
> > IMO adding such kind of jokes isn't improving overall impression.
> >
> > This joke is stupid.
>
> It isn't umlaut, and it isn't "obviously incorrect", just unusual:
Thanks for the correction, it is indeed "Diaeresis", not umlaut.
Thanks for the link.
It underlines my error: "Often mistakenly called an umlaut" :D
I thought the diaresis was mostly from French.
French often use that "Diaeresis" nowadays, as opposed to English, where I only saw ï in naïve.
IMO using diaeresis in coöperate and in reïmagined is playing smartass, until all "foo" instances replaced with "foö" through all the Perl source code.
This approach also disrespects German (and Estonian) reading of such letters.
>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at-play/mary-
> norris-diaeresis__;!!LpKI!iMXf_ZL9C-PSQMdpJ3wrN3WnH6xCnqCrQ19GQVRIYwC9i_EOx67Os
> Rw5zCKpY2ImT1mpHNuaUk19xEs$ [merriam-webster[.]com]
>
Internal Use - Confidential
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next