> Next (meta)-question: Should this be turned into a full RFC, or is it > small and concise enough that these questions and any subsequent > discussion on a PR would be sufficient? I think this should go via an RFC. The idea is that changes to the language should go through the RFC process, and the process should be able to handle both heavy- and light-weight proposals. In addition, I think at least a week should elapse before a Pre-RFC can move forward. Not everyone is able to keep on top of p5p on a daily basis, but there should be enough time allowed for people to read and comment, if they want to. NeilThread Previous | Thread Next