On Tue, Jun 21, 2022, at 04:45, Paul "LeoNerd" Evans wrote: > I think there's two things we need to do: > > 1) Make ~~ and given/when much louder about their "you shouldn't use > this for new code" status; Agreed. Let's do that immediately? > 2) Create a better replacement I'm all for having a better replacement, but I continue to strongly oppose the idea that we *need* one to remove the old thing. I write a lot of Perl, and have since before smartmatch was introduced. I never used smartmatch for much. I have banned it from my projects. I have seen it largely unused. Nothing it does can't be done some other way already, although sometime more verbosely. We don't need a replacement, because *we have gotten along fine without using it for 20 years.* A replacement would be nice, if it's good, but it doesn't need to exist before we take the old thing out. -- rjbsThread Previous | Thread Next