> On that thought: Maybe from now onwards we say that any accepted RFC > gets allocated the number that its github PR was I think better to _not_ use the PR number. There will be PRs done against that repo for other reasons, and multiple PRs against the same RFC as well. This will result in a non-contiguous sequence of RFC numbers, and people possible what happened to RFC#23. I think there should be a clear step in the process where the PSC say "yup, we think this should have a formal RFC", at which point the number is assigned and recorded in the tracker. NeilThread Previous | Thread Next