On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 18:52:53 +0100 Neil Bowers <neilb@neilb.org> wrote: > We revisited this in today’s PSC meeting, and agreed that it should > be marked as rejected. As Rik noted last week, a more holistic > approach is really called for, which would be a different proposal. Also I note that this sort of thing is easily solved by modules. E.g. IPC::Run which would write this as run [ $command, "with", @args ], '>', \my $output; It's slightly weird syntax perhaps, but it's just a module. We could consider either pulling IPC::Run into core, or making some new "IPC"-type module that is core, to handle all these sorts of things. It doesn't need to be core language syntax. -- Paul "LeoNerd" Evans leonerd@leonerd.org.uk | https://metacpan.org/author/PEVANS http://www.leonerd.org.uk/ | https://www.tindie.com/stores/leonerd/Thread Previous | Thread Next