Thanks Tomasz. In https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=142390&results=a9b6c54a15dcc7fea4b584327a5e1d17 we're looking at how to hide the Socket.xs implementations of inet_pton() and inet_ntop() in those situations where the Windows implementation of those 2 functions are being used. (t's a fatal error if both the Windows and Socket.xs implementations are found.) If you get the opportunity to take a look at that ticket, your advice on how best to achieve that desired outcome would be most welcome. Cheers, Rob On Tue, May 31, 2022 at 2:37 PM Tomasz Konojacki <me@xenu.pl> wrote: > On Tue, 31 May 2022 12:36:30 +1000 > sisyphus <sisyphus359@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Specifically, as regards creating patches to bleadperl, do I need to > cater > > for the possibility that someone might be building bleadperl on Windows > XP ? > > > > Might it make a difference if the part of bleadperl I'm patching was > > dual-life ? > > > > Cheers, > > Rob > > I was going to write a rant about how README.win32 still requires us to > support Windows 2000, but apparently it was stealthly bumped to Windows > 7: > > > https://github.com/Perl/perl5/commit/4695dc7a419b3069e06d2051ff1a6c9daca6c881 > > I guess Windows 7 is the minimum version now. >Thread Previous | Thread Next