On Friday, 11 February 2022, 10:52:36 CET, Neil Bowers <neilb@neilb.org> wrote: > We think there's definitely scope for improving Perl's support for creating modules > of function libraries, and the import mechanism. <snip> > So in its current form, we've marked this as rejected, but we think this is an area > that's ripe for more thought. Part of that should include a review of CPAN and the > problems with the current options. I've been mulling over this for some time because I wanted to have clear thoughts on it and check what's on the CPAN. I withdraw the `:version` and `:export` parts of this, though I would love to see a lexical export solution. However, the core idea seems solid. Unfortunately, I cannot find anything on the CPAN which solidly supports what I'm looking for. Going with `library` instead of `module` as a keyword: library My::Library 0.01 { sub foo ($bar) { ... } library Pretty { # My::Library::Pretty # Public } library Utils :private { # My::Library::Utils # Private to My::Library and enclosed libraries } } (I get sick and tired of writing "Utils" packages to organize my code and littering the global namespace) I could write up more (better keyword suggestions needed), but I simply can't find anything comparable on the CPAN and despite asking around, no one else has offered suggestions. Can anyone offer pointers? Best, Ovid -- IT consulting, training, specializing in Perl, databases, and agile development http://www.allaroundtheworld.fr/. Buy my book! - http://bit.ly/beginning_perlThread Previous | Thread Next