Hi there, On Tue, 8 Mar 2022, Karl Williamson wrote: > On 3/8/22 07:38, Graham Knop wrote: >> ... >> I've created an RFC PR: https://github.com/Perl/RFCs/pull/13 >> >> In the RFC, I'm using the names builtin::created_as_number and >> builtin::created_as_string. Justification is included in the RFC, but >> I think these better match what we want their return values to >> represent. And I personally, was_originally_number feels really >> awkward as a function name. The names could still be changed of >> course; I'm not overly attached to what I've chosen. > > I think "created_as..." are better than previous suggestions +1 -- 73, Ged.Thread Previous | Thread Next