On Feb 24, 2022, at 9:04 AM, Paul LeoNerd Evans <leonerd@leonerd.org.uk> wrote: > I wonder if we can find some sort of "has"-like wording, that fits > these? While I don't think these are good names as such, I think if the > names had been something like > > builtin::has_truthiness > has_numberness > has_stringiness > ... > > Then it would be less surprising that something like the $! dualvar has > both numberness and stringiness, as it would be to find out that it > *is* both a number and a string. "has_number_nature" and "has_string_nature"? JoshThread Previous | Thread Next