> On Feb 24, 2022, at 06:36, Paul LeoNerd Evans <leonerd@leonerd.org.uk> wrote: > > Given I think we are now all agreed that mutate-in-place is a terrible > idea, I don't think this naming distinction needs to remain. What gives you this impression? The rationale for in-place modification was/is consistency with existing built-ins, esp. chomp. AFAICT that hasn’t changed. -FThread Previous | Thread Next