We've been maintaining an AUTHORS file for more than twenty years, but in these days of git I'm kind of wondering why we still do this. We actually have tests that check if any new addition matches git, why don't we just rely on git instead? And remain a HISTORIC-AUTHORS file honoring the contributors who predate our transition to git. Right now it's a recurring source of test failures for new contributors, without providing any clear benefit IME. Why would we keep doing this? LeonThread Next