On Fri, 21 Jan 2022 at 17:19, Dave Mitchell <davem@iabyn.com> wrote: > On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 02:40:09PM -0500, Ricardo Signes wrote: > > Hello, I am joining this thread way up at the top, because the bottom > > looks like it's gotten pretty sticky. > > Hello, thought I'd join you up here where the air is clear and the views > spectacular! > > > On the other hand, I think everybody basically agrees that the "fixed" > > behavior is preferable > > ribasushi, shadowcat-mst and Vincent Pit in the ticket for 'BBC breaks > DBIx:Class' (#17663), all seemed to think my patch was in some way > philosophically wrong, but to varying degrees agreed to work around it if > we insisted on (eventually) un-reverting it. > > So I think we could do with a bit more discussion, which I will seed > below. But my opinion so far is that my patch is correct and should be > applied, but directly after 5.36.0 is released, to give distro owners max > time to fix things up. > I would like to get it released in 5.36.0 as a build option. I know people who would use that build option and are backporting your original patch and if there are conflicts I would like to get it resolved. More specifically Booking has been backporting your patch ever since you wrote it, to perls from before when you wrote it. Thus a long time, (with no issue mind you). Even though I don't work at Booking any more I would like to get this sorted out so my friends and colleagues there do not have to deal with it. I would be happy to write the required code. cheers, YvesThread Previous | Thread Next