* Darren Duncan <darren@darrenduncan.net> [2022-01-25 18:09:31 -0800]: > On 2022-01-25 5:27 p.m., Oodler 577 via perl5-porters wrote: > > Apologies for me not tracking this very well. > > > > What is "Amores" and how does it relate to "Corinna" and, in general, > > Perl OOP? > > All you have to do is look at the p5p posts from 8 hours prior to my post > that you responded to. Ovid made a post about Amores which is a name to > refer to his proposal about adding a "module" keyword to Perl for exportable > subs, and it is a counterpart to Corinna which is about OOP. You don't have > to dig much, its all from earlier today. -- Darren Duncan I saw that. I guess I picked the wrong day to stop sniffing glue. So do I add "Amores" to the "Cor/Corinna/Perl7" bucket or it, like, a new thing? Can't it just be a normal titled pre-RFC? Or are we all expected to now add some weird codename reference to proposals that should just otherwise we titled what they are? Oh, here we go WP to the rescue: Amores is Ovid's first completed book of poetry, written in elegiac couplets. It was first published in 16 BC in five books, but Ovid, by his own account, later edited it down into the three-book edition that survives today Okay now we're on to somthing. Still doesn't explain how this relates to some strategic plan to zip up both trad Perl and POOP into one harmonious poop utopia. Care to explain what the overall play is here? This may also hopefully help explain to me what "non-OOP" C<module> is going to actually do for the regular perl stiff. Cheers, Brett -- -- oodler@cpan.org oodler577@sdf-eu.org SDF-EU Public Access UNIX System - http://sdfeu.org irc.perl.org #openmp #pdl #nativeThread Previous | Thread Next