On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 5:42 AM Neil Bowers <neilb@neilb.org> wrote: > I like the idea of syntactic support for function libraries, but I don’t > like the proposed use of the word "module". > > We have existing, well-established, terminology where a *module* is a > package in a .pm file of the corresponding name, and a module can either be > a class *or* a function library (or the love child of both). > > I don’t have a great alternative to suggest ("sublibrary", "exporter", > "library", … ?) > Each of these features can simply be implemented in the existing syntax and no new keyword is needed. -DanThread Previous | Thread Next