2022-1-20 14:32 Dan Book <grinnz@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 12:20 AM Darren Duncan <darren@darrenduncan.net> > wrote: > >> On 2022-01-19 12:43 p.m., Alexander Hartmaier wrote: >> > I have one sad example to add: defining a sub that is passed as a >> callback to a >> > module which doesn't document the (number of) arguments and call it in >> different >> > parts with a different number of arguments. Example I'm just dealing >> with is >> > Mojo::RabbitMQ::Client. >> > In the end I gave up and didn't specify a signature to avoid exceptions >> caused >> > by the different number of arguments. >> >> So here's a question. The way signatures work now, if one puts "@" at >> the end >> of the signature, does that say silently accept but throw away the extra >> arguments, or is there some way in a signature to say explicitly that you >> take a >> variable number of arguments and there is an array you can get "the rest" >> in? > > > ($arg, @rest) > > -Dan > Do you recommend the following code to the Perl users? sub foo ($arg, @rest) { my ($foo, $bar) = @rest; } Instead of sub foo ($arg, $foo, $bar) { }Thread Previous | Thread Next