On Thu, Jan 20, 2022 at 12:20 AM Darren Duncan <darren@darrenduncan.net> wrote: > On 2022-01-19 12:43 p.m., Alexander Hartmaier wrote: > > I have one sad example to add: defining a sub that is passed as a > callback to a > > module which doesn't document the (number of) arguments and call it in > different > > parts with a different number of arguments. Example I'm just dealing > with is > > Mojo::RabbitMQ::Client. > > In the end I gave up and didn't specify a signature to avoid exceptions > caused > > by the different number of arguments. > > So here's a question. The way signatures work now, if one puts "@" at the > end > of the signature, does that say silently accept but throw away the extra > arguments, or is there some way in a signature to say explicitly that you > take a > variable number of arguments and there is an array you can get "the rest" > in? ($arg, @rest) -DanThread Previous | Thread Next