Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from January 2022
On Mon, Jan 17, 2022, at 4:05 AM, Ovid wrote: > On Sunday, 16 January 2022, 21:27:01 CET, Ricardo Signes <perl.p5p@rjbs.manxome.org> wrote: > > > > The current implementation of required methods is to simply create a forward declaration: method > > > foo; without listing the signature. Signatures are currently not introspectable, so we cannot use them > > > to verify that the correct required method is present > > > > How much inspectability would you have? Arity? Variable name? Requiredness of each? Op tree of > > defaults? :) > > Is this needing an answer now? I've started to answer several times and it kept getting too long-winded and too speculative, and I'm going to do it again. It doesn't need to be answered now. I only ask because inspecting arity of subroutines was a live conversation in another thread. Thanks for your comments on this, I read them and took them in. -- rjbsThread Previous | Thread Next