develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from January 2022

Re: Broken stack traces from use statements.

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
demerphq
Date:
January 16, 2022 06:56
Subject:
Re: Broken stack traces from use statements.
Message ID:
CANgJU+WkqAYoHa2AYGGbHZfQ-uisNZByA7Y_QjQzLAvNefoTgg@mail.gmail.com
On Sat, 15 Jan 2022 at 19:01, Karen Etheridge <perl@froods.org> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 10:06 PM demerphq <demerphq@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks, although I feel it is worth noting that this was not a fix to
>> DBIx::Class and the patch never broke DBIx::Class, it was the tests for
>> DBIx::Class that were broken only.
>>
>
> I don't think that's very fair to say.
>

Fair is a question of subjective opinion. Correctness should be of
universal agreement. If something isnt correct it is broken.

Would you take this position if someone built a dependency on the exact
hash order returned by an old Perl?

Yves
Thread Previous | Thread Next

nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About