> On Dec 9, 2021, at 13:37, Dave Mitchell <davem@iabyn.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 09, 2021 at 05:36:06PM +0000, Paul "LeoNerd" Evans wrote: >> This was the problem though - I couldn't work out how to keep @DB::args >> working in that situation. > > A more radical proposition would be to declare that @DB::args will always > return empty for signature subs. Would that break stack traces--or at least the argument-listing part of them? If so, that would seem to be an unfortunate disincentive to adopt signatures. -FGThread Previous | Thread Next