develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from December 2021

Re: Any outstanding branches of op.c? / Split into smaller pieces

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Paul "LeoNerd" Evans
Date:
December 5, 2021 11:48
Subject:
Re: Any outstanding branches of op.c? / Split into smaller pieces
Message ID:
20211205114841.6d69a7ec@shy.leonerd.org.uk
On Sun, 5 Dec 2021 11:31:40 +0000
Nicholas Clark <nick@ccl4.org> wrote:

> I don't see any risk in marking anything 'p' rather than 's' in
> embed.fnc
> - ie turning functions non-static. That's not making any promises
> that might be hard to keep, or we might regret with hindsight.
> 
> We can think about what APIs *should* be independent of that change,
> without rushing it. Otherwise we're just assuming that our 25-year
> old internal spaghetti makes sense as exposed APIs, which I very much
> doubt.

I guess that's fair, yes. I can just mark them all internal, and
perhaps in a later step we can review what new functions I added in
that way, with a view to deciding "can this be publicised?".

But you're right - that decision should be a separate step and not
rushed as part of this internal shuffling-of-deckchairs.

-- 
Paul "LeoNerd" Evans

leonerd@leonerd.org.uk      |  https://metacpan.org/author/PEVANS
http://www.leonerd.org.uk/  |  https://www.tindie.com/stores/leonerd/

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About