2021-10-4 5:42 Ricardo Signes <perl.p5p@rjbs.manxome.org> wrote: > Porters, > > *:const* — This is a somewhat esoteric feature, but I have used it and it > does what it says on the tin. I believe it is largely unused, but the > behavior is what I expected, and it is occasionally useful. Unless it is > going to produce an undue maintenance burden, *I believe we should land > this experiment.* What prevents us from doing so? #14428 > <https://github.com/Perl/perl5/issues/14428> > > Is there anyone who opposes removing experimental status from const subroutine attribute?Thread Previous | Thread Next