develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from October 2021

Re: review of perlexperiment, 2021-10

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Yuki Kimoto
Date:
October 29, 2021 00:44
Subject:
Re: review of perlexperiment, 2021-10
Message ID:
CAExogxNLV4y_fK38W51AxAxiknM_f0q2i7ChD17J8DWm8TuJdA@mail.gmail.com
2021-10-4 5:42 Ricardo Signes <perl.p5p@rjbs.manxome.org> wrote:

> Porters,
>
> *:const* — This is a somewhat esoteric feature, but I have used it and it
> does what it says on the tin.  I believe it is largely unused, but the
> behavior is what I expected, and it is occasionally useful.  Unless it is
> going to produce an undue maintenance burden, *I believe we should land
> this experiment.*  What prevents us from doing so?  #14428
> <https://github.com/Perl/perl5/issues/14428>
>
>
Is there anyone who opposes removing experimental status from const
subroutine attribute?

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About