Ricardo Signes writes: > I propose that the next step here is to provide a load-at-runtime > built-in that expects the name of a module and dies on error. At some > future time, if we overhaul exceptions, we can fix both it and > "require" then. In the meantime, I don't think it's economical to > make load-at-runtime wait on an exception overhaul. > > Thoughts? Sounds wonderful. > Shall I write the RFC? Yes please! SmylersThread Previous | Thread Next