On Fri, 20 Aug 2021 11:55:00 +0100 "Paul \"LeoNerd\" Evans" <leonerd@leonerd.org.uk> wrote: > As far as I can tell there isn't an equivalent numerical one, for > `==`. I've had to write myself a 47 line wrapper function by copying > out the logic from Perl's (non-API-exposed) Perl_do_ncmp() function. For further context: https://metacpan.org/release/PEVANS/Syntax-Keyword-Match-0.07/source/lib/Syntax/Keyword/Match.xs#L35-85 -- Paul "LeoNerd" Evans leonerd@leonerd.org.uk | https://metacpan.org/author/PEVANS http://www.leonerd.org.uk/ | https://www.tindie.com/stores/leonerd/Thread Previous | Thread Next