Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from August 2021
On 8/4/21 7:58 AM, Paul "LeoNerd" Evans wrote: > I propose the addition of a new SV type, of SVt_BOOL. Should I write an > RFC? > > This type will act much like the existing "booleans" of PL_sv_no and > PL_sv_yes, except its type will remain distinct, so it will be possible > to distinguish "that SV is a boolean". This is a requirement for > certain kinds of data serialisation - such as JSON or MsgPack - and may > be useful for many other purposes too. > > Still to be determined: a pureperl interface on it. E.g. would this be > possible: > > use feature 'bool'; > > my $yes = true; # new literal value keywords > my $no = false; # > > use Scalar::Util 'svtype'; > > is( svtype($yes), "BOOL", 'true is SVt_BOOL'); > > Thoughts on a postcard*. > > > *: Where "postcard" means: **PLEASE KEEP REPLIES SHORT**. This is a > pre-RFC question. Replies should be limited to the question of whether > I should write the RFC - not about the feature itself. > I would *LOVE* this in Perl. I thought about requesting it myself but every other post online asking about boolean in Perl is "you don't need it in Perl" so I assumed the community was against it. I support this 1000%. I even support this more than putting *trim()* in core, but only by a little bit. - ScottThread Previous | Thread Next