Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from July 2021
2021-7-26 0:26 Oodler 577 via perl5-porters <perl5-porters@perl.org> wrote: > > The ideas of "practical" concurrency is way more important to > perl/Perl's future than virtually any other issue. This includes > Perl OOP. p5p, I agree, is not the place for most of what'd be > captured on any list. > > The word "concurrency" is always ambiguous when people talk about "concurrency". I hear the this conversation "Perl doesn't have concurrency, so Perl can't use CPUs in parallel" But, I know the pre-fork model Perl web applications are using CPUs in parallel. I think we need to properly classify concurrency(fork, thread, I/O, CPU(OpenMP), GPU, coroutine, async/await syntax) before we say we want to add concurrency.Thread Previous | Thread Next