Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed.

Den 2021-07-05 kl. 03:53 skrev Christian Walde:
> I think it's a good idea to respect this:
> 
> On Mon, 24 May 2021 09:54:01 +0200, Nicholas Clark <nick@ccl4.org> wrote:
> 
>> Thanks for thinking this through, and writing a clear explanation.
>>
>> So, "removing sigils" has been discussed and is not feasible
>>
>> It is not happening. No more mails about it.
>>
>> Nicholas Clark

Thanks Christian, I missed that message.

• Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by L A Walsh
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by John Ankarström
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by Philip R Brenan
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by Christian Walde
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by John Ankarström
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by Oodler 577 via perl5-porters
• Re: sigil-optional subject clarification by L A Walsh
• Re: sigil-optional subject clarification by Neil Bowers
• Re: sigil-optional subject clarification by L A Walsh
• Re: sigil-optional subject clarification by Ricardo Signes
• Re: sigil-optional subject clarification by Neil Bowers
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by Alexandr Evstigneev
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by Nicholas Clark
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by Tomasz Konojacki
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by Nicholas Clark
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by Achim Gratz
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by Nicholas Clark
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by Sergey Aleynikov
• Re: binary compatibility between minor releases by Nicholas Clark
• binary compatibility between minor releases by Niko Tyni
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by Paul "LeoNerd" Evans
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by Philip R Brenan
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by L A Walsh
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival,otherlikely needed. by Aaron Priven
• Re: opsig feature... by L A Walsh
• Re: opsig feature... by mah.kitteh via perl5-porters
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival,otherlikely needed. by Dan Book