develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from May 2021

Re: Revisiting trim

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Tomasz Konojacki
Date:
May 27, 2021 17:00
Subject:
Re: Revisiting trim
Message ID:
20210527185949.5D85.5C4F47F8@xenu.pl
On Thu, 27 May 2021 16:44:42 +0000
"mah.kitteh via perl5-porters" <perl5-porters@perl.org> wrote:


> This is quite presumptuous. There has been no conversation on where to place this. It's very concerning to me that there has also been very little discussion about "where" to place this "single" (yeah right) core feature. At this point, and mainly due to the pressure and rush being applied to this, my general concern as I said last night is not necessarily "trim" as the POC is currently implemented; but what comes after "trim" and how it's handed - string related or not. So what's the rush? No rush exists other than the proof of concept work facing potential bit rot. That's not really perl's problem.

There was a lot of conversation. There are literally *hundreds* of posts
about trim on p5p and github. The discussion has been going for almost a
year now.

https://github.com/Perl/perl5/issues/17952
https://github.com/Perl/perl5/pull/17999

In chronological order:

https://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl5.porters/2020/07/msg258058.html
https://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl5.porters/2020/11/msg258544.html
https://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl5.porters/2021/02/msg259118.html
https://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl5.porters/2021/03/msg259427.html
https://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.perl5.porters/2021/03/msg259615.html


Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About