Re: sigil-optional subject clarification

Hi Linda,

Please stop bringing this topic up on p5p.

If you want to give this a go, we’d be happy to hear about this once you’ve got working code that passes all of Perl’s tests and doesn’t break CPAN. If others want to join you in that endeavour, you could set up a mailing list for discussing that work. p5p is not that mailing list.

Until then, no further discussion of this here please.

Thanks,
Neil

• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival,otherlikely needed. by Aaron Priven
• Re: opsig feature... by L A Walsh
• Re: opsig feature... by mah.kitteh via perl5-porters
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival,otherlikely needed. by Dan Book
• Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by L A Walsh
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by =?UTF-8?Q?John_Ankarstr=c3=b6m?=
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by Philip R Brenan
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by Christian Walde
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by =?UTF-8?Q?John_Ankarstr=c3=b6m?=
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by Oodler 577 via perl5-porters
• Re: sigil-optional subject clarification by L A Walsh
• Re: sigil-optional subject clarification by Neil Bowers
• Re: sigil-optional subject clarification by L A Walsh
• Re: sigil-optional subject clarification by Ricardo Signes
• Re: sigil-optional subject clarification by Neil Bowers
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by Alexandr Evstigneev
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by Nicholas Clark
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by Tomasz Konojacki
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by Nicholas Clark
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by Achim Gratz
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by Nicholas Clark
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by Sergey Aleynikov
• Re: binary compatibility between minor releases by Nicholas Clark
• binary compatibility between minor releases by Niko Tyni
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by Paul "LeoNerd" Evans
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by Philip R Brenan
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by L A Walsh