Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed.

On Sun, 23 May 2021 12:33:58 -0700
L A Walsh <astara@tlinx.org> wrote:

> 2) Going 'unnecessary-sigil' optional.

My personal response here:

If you wanted Python, you know where to find it.

-- 
Paul "LeoNerd" Evans

leonerd@leonerd.org.uk      |  https://metacpan.org/author/PEVANS
http://www.leonerd.org.uk/  |  https://www.tindie.com/stores/leonerd/

• Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by L A Walsh
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by John Ankarström
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by Philip R Brenan
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by Christian Walde
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by John Ankarström
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by Oodler 577 via perl5-porters
• Re: sigil-optional subject clarification by L A Walsh
• Re: sigil-optional subject clarification by Neil Bowers
• Re: sigil-optional subject clarification by L A Walsh
• Re: sigil-optional subject clarification by Ricardo Signes
• Re: sigil-optional subject clarification by Neil Bowers
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by Alexandr Evstigneev
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by Nicholas Clark
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by Tomasz Konojacki
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by Nicholas Clark
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by Achim Gratz
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by Nicholas Clark
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by Sergey Aleynikov
• Re: binary compatibility between minor releases by Nicholas Clark
• binary compatibility between minor releases by Niko Tyni
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by Paul "LeoNerd" Evans
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by Philip R Brenan
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival, otherlikely needed. by L A Walsh
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival,otherlikely needed. by Aaron Priven
• Re: opsig feature... by L A Walsh
• Re: opsig feature... by mah.kitteh via perl5-porters
• Re: Two further features, one definitely needed for survival,otherlikely needed. by Dan Book