On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 4:37 PM Christian Walde <walde.christian@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, 27 Mar 2021 15:54:54 +0100, Eirik Berg Hanssen < > Eirik-Berg.Hanssen@allverden.no> wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 1:35 PM Paul "LeoNerd" Evans < > leonerd@leonerd.org.uk> wrote: > >> Without wishing to respond to the specifics of the details this thread >> is throwing up, I want to make a meta-observation. >> >> There seems to be a lot more people replying on this email thread who >> seem to care about higher principles of language design, than were ever >> present on the original github discussions about the feature: >> >> https://github.com/Perl/perl5/issues/17952 >> >> I would like to ask: Where were you all earlier? Why didn't you respond >> there before we'd written it? >> > > If I'm included in that: I was here. With a mailing list subscription, > but no Github account. > > And no, I won't sign up for Github. > > > Eirik > > > FYI: Even if you didn't make an account, nothing stops you from reading > along. > And indeed, I did read along. > And while i'm fine with having objections against github, i think basic > decency and politeness and respect for Scott's work who had no big choice > in where he got feedback means at the very least the two threads he linked > should've been read. > I have read those. I'm pretty sure I read through them last year. And I definitely read through them again when the PSC made their call. Okay, I might have missed some recent additions thanks to the friendly interface hiding so much, but I don't see off hand that I missed anything significant. Clue me in? > Was there some kind of conception that an account was needed to read? > The question I was responding to wasn't related to reading â it was " Why didn't you respond there before we'd written it?" And I took "there" to refer to "the original github discussions about the feature". I will not respond "there". If that means I'm not welcome "here", let me know, and I'll just unsubscribe. EirikThread Previous | Thread Next