develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from March 2021

Re: [DISCUSS] The future of mod_perl

Thread Previous | Thread Next
B. Estrade
March 25, 2021 07:34
Re: [DISCUSS] The future of mod_perl
Message ID:
The discussion on the ASF list for mod_perl indicates that it is 
mod_perl, not mod_perl2; since they differentiate between by seeing the 
subject of adjacent threads. So idk.

What's interesting is that it seems like the conversation on EOL'ing 
mod_perl is limited to this month, and it seems more like a "what if" 
thrown out for an unknown reason. I can't find anything "official" 
sounding. It's also kind of dumb to EOL a stable and well used piece of 
software that requires very little maintenance, save tracking Apache httpd.

The only other active lists other than mod_perl@ are the CVS lists, 
which shows maintenance activity late into 2020.

Is p5p and mod_perl@ the only places where the specter of the EOL of 
mod_perl has even been raised? Google seems to think so.

If any good has come out of it, the mod_perl list seems to be more 
active than it has been in a very long time :)


On 3/25/21 1:04 AM, Yuki Kimoto wrote:
>  > The future of mod_perl
> is this mod_perl or mod_perl2?
> 2021年3月18日(木) 5:41 André Warnier (tomcat/perl) < 
> <>>:
>     Just received.
>     Is this a wake-up call ?
>     I am just a (enthousiastic but old) *user* of perl and mod_perl, and
>     in no way technically
>     capable of contributing to a project like this.
>     But I feel that "losing" (*) mod_perl would be a major blow to perl
>     in general.
>     (*) If this is really what the email below is hinting at, and if I'm
>     not over-dramatising
>     things.
>     -------- Forwarded Message --------
>     Subject:        [DISCUSS] The future of mod_perl
>     Date:   Wed, 17 Mar 2021 20:40:33 +0100
>     From:   Sander Striker < <>>
>     To: <>,
> <>
>     Dear community members,
>     As projects mature, they will naturally reach a point where activity
>     reduces to a level
>     such that the project is no longer sustainable.  At Apache, projects
>     reach this stage when
>     there are not at least 3 active PMC members providing oversight.
>     Projects that reach this
>     stage are usually placed in the Attic [1] or absorbed by another
>     Apache project willing to
>     manage its releases.
>     If you are interested in seeing mod_perl remain an active project,
>     and are able to help
>     maintain and provide oversight, please respond in this thread
>     indicating that you are
>     interested in performing the duties of a PMC member[2].
>     Cheers,
>     Sander Striker
>     Director, The Apache Software Foundation
>     [1] <>
>     [2]
>     <>

Thread Previous | Thread Next Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at | Group listing | About