Thank you for your reply! On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 11:48 AM demerphq <demerphq@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 11 Nov 2020 at 18:32, Corwin Brust <corwin@bru.st> wrote: > > > > Hi! Long-time listener, first-time caller. > > > > On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 10:34 AM Konovalov, Vadim > > <Vadim.Konovalov@dell.com> wrote: > > > > > > Absolutely agree. > > > Please add my voice to the pool, and count it carefully. > > > [snip] > Things that are exposed as normal functions in a namespace are > trivially back portable: Why is back-portability an important concern when discussing features proposed for future perls? Thank you. CorwinThread Previous | Thread Next