On 06/29/2020 13:13, Salvador Fandiño wrote: > If I had understood correctly the aim behind p7, it is to get people > to use the new features. Just the opposite of encouraging people to > write code compatible with p5, right? > > If you want to remain compatible with both perl5 and perl7, you are > going to have the worst of both worlds. You would not be able to use > "features" removed from perl7 neither would you be able to use the new > features added. This seems terrible. It can't possibly be canon. It implies a 7PAN that is mutually exclusive from CPAN. How are people going to navigate that? -- End of message.Thread Previous | Thread Next