develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from May 2020

Re: Perl moving above 5.x version numbers

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
=?UTF-8?B?0JzQuNGF0LDQuNC7INCa0L7Qt9Cw0YfQutC+0LI=?=
Date:
May 19, 2020 08:35
Subject:
Re: Perl moving above 5.x version numbers
Message ID:
014e45d6-d7e8-834b-cb15-5a99db04d6fd@gmail.com
If Perl 6 is Raku now maybe we can use Perl 6 after Perl 5 later?

On 5/19/20 7:54 AM, Darren Duncan wrote:
> Now that Raku has, or is in the process of, no longer using the Perl 
> version namespace, has there been any serious consideration by the Perl 
> 5 Porters to start exploiting version numbers above 5.x for major releases?
> 
> I propose, if possible, that the next major production version of Perl 
> after 5.32 be 34.0, and then continue on in that manner afterwards.
> 
> As for dealing with distinguishing development versus production, the 
> smallest change would be just to take the current process and shift it 
> to the left, so eg 33.x is dev (or as a special case could be 5.33.x as 
> a transitional exception), 34.x is prod, 35.x is dev, and so on.
> 
> Do we consider that Perl is free to independently make this move, or 
> does anyone feel that Raku still has to do more than they have done 
> first so that conflicts or incompatibilities can be prevented?
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> -- Darren Duncan

-- 
Mikhail Kozachkov

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About