On Sat, 7 Mar 2020 17:07:04 +0000 "Paul \"LeoNerd\" Evans" <leonerd@leonerd.org.uk> wrote: > 2b) Import the simpler syntax as it currently stands (and possibly > even without the `catch my $e ...` form), then experiment on > CPAN with the typing and do a second round into core afterwards. > > I don't think 2b would necessarily be too bad. It compares e.g. with > sub signatures, which turned up in a relatively simple form early on > and had a couple of versions of iteration where more features were > added and expanded on the "obvious holes" left in the first one. I > could see a simple try/catch being added as a first step while > preserving the lexical gap between "catch" and its brace-delimited > body for where to put some as-yet-undecided syntax for that type > dispatch. Given the lack of comment for or against, I'm going to follow this route. That and my oodles of free time given the current worldwide virus situation, I think I should be able to work on something. I'm not intending to have anything in time for 5.32, it being a bit late now, but my hope is to have something that looks merge-ready early in the round for 5.33.x so we'll have plenty of time to bring it into blead and test it out, before it hits 5.34. -- Paul "LeoNerd" Evans leonerd@leonerd.org.uk | https://metacpan.org/author/PEVANS http://www.leonerd.org.uk/ | https://www.tindie.com/stores/leonerd/Thread Previous | Thread Next