Re: Thoughts in the direction of a core try/catch syntax

On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 1:30 AM <hv@crypt.org> wrote:
> The list-returning capability does not sound problematic from a semantic
> point of view. The type-dispatch implicit in efficient propagation of
> unhandled exceptions sounds a lot harder, so if at all possible I'd
> suggest again experimenting with that in CPAN - adding (temporary,
> experimental) hooks as necessary to permit it - rather than trying
> to introduce it in core ab initio.

Ideally, the error dispatch would be able to re-use a dumber
smartmatch like the one Paul other topic.
This rather sounds like a killing two birds with one stone kind of situation.

Leon

• Thoughts in the direction of a core try/catch syntax by Paul "LeoNerd" Evans
• Re: Thoughts in the direction of a core try/catch syntax by Paul Johnson
• Re: Thoughts in the direction of a core try/catch syntax by Paul "LeoNerd" Evans
• Re: Thoughts in the direction of a core try/catch syntax by Andrew Hewus Fresh
• Re: Thoughts in the direction of a core try/catch syntax by Karen Etheridge
• Re: Thoughts in the direction of a core try/catch syntax by Paul "LeoNerd" Evans
• Re: Thoughts in the direction of a core try/catch syntax by hv
• Re: Thoughts in the direction of a core try/catch syntax by Paul "LeoNerd" Evans
• Re: Thoughts in the direction of a core try/catch syntax by Paul "LeoNerd" Evans
• Re: Thoughts in the direction of a core try/catch syntax by Leon Timmermans
• Re: Thoughts in the direction of a core try/catch syntax by Paul "LeoNerd" Evans
• Re: Thoughts in the direction of a core try/catch syntax by H.Merijn Brand
• Dumbmatch operators [was Re: Thoughts in the direction of a coretry/catch syntax] by Paul "LeoNerd" Evans
• Re: Thoughts in the direction of a core try/catch syntax by Dan Book