Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from March 2020
Re: chained comparisons
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next
From:
Karl Williamson
Date:
March 7, 2020 17:12
Subject:
Re: chained comparisons
Message ID:
b6ef97f1-cdb1-469a-a6c4-c5c3827f9f7a@khwilliamson.com
On 3/6/20 12:55 PM, David Nicol wrote:
> awesome possum!
>
> On Fri, Mar 6, 2020 at 1:50 PM Zefram via perl5-porters
> <perl5-porters@perl.org <mailto:perl5-porters@perl.org>> wrote:
>
> David Nicol wrote:
> >does it short-circuit as soon as possible starting from the left, on
> >failure? that is, when A is greater than B, C<< A <= B <= C >> won't
> >evaluate C?
>
> Yes, it does short-circuit in that case, and won't evaluate C.
>
> >also can the with and without equals versions (lt, le), (<, <=),
> (gt, ge),
> >and (>, >=) chain together
>
> Yes, all of those operators chain with each other.
>
> -zefram
>
>
>
> --
> "I know Darth Vader's really got you annoyed
> but remember if you kill him then you'll be unemployed" -- Alfred M.
> Yankovic
Where do we stand on this? Is it able to be put in core in the next 2
weeks?
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next