Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from February 2020
I wrote: :James E Keenan <jkeenan@pobox.com> wrote: :[...] ::perl Porting/bisect.pl --start=v5.31.2 --end=v5.31.3 \ ::-Dcc="g++7" \ ::-Accflags="-Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc7" \ ::-Aldflags="-Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc7" \ ::--expect-fail --target t/op/sprintf2.t :: ::But that ends with this: :: ::t/op/sprintf2 ... ok ::All tests successful. ::Elapsed: 1 sec ::u=0.02 s=0.00 cu=0.24 cs=0.07 scripts=1 tests=1699 ::HEAD is now at 45e0524192 5.31.2 today ::bad - zero exit from sh -c cd t && ./perl TEST op\/sprintf2\.t ::Runner returned 256, not 0 for start revision at : :That looks to me like it's saying the test passed at the start revision, :v5.31.2, unexpectedly. To expand on that: expect-fail is implemented by setting expect-pass to 0, and then handled in bisect-runner.pl report_and_exit(), where it is used to invert the return value seen by bisect.pl. So the test passed, the test run returned 0, so report_and_exit returned non-zero, and that's why it complains "Runner returned 256, not 0 for start revision". HugoThread Previous | Thread Next