Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from January 2020
So this enables indirect everywhere? That doesnt sound at all reasonable to me... I expect such a construct to be lexically scoped in which case why would it break CPAN? Yves On Sun, 26 Jan 2020, 12:11 Karen Etheridge, <perl@froods.org> wrote: > I would love to see this in 5.32 if possible, but can we get an idea > of its impact first? Is it possible to smoke this against cpan (or > the cpan-3000)? > > On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 6:53 AM Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker > <ilmari@ilmari.org> wrote: > > > > Hi Porters, > > > > Based on TonyC's initial "use feature 'noindirect';"¹ PR, I've created > > another one for "no feature 'indirect';"², which inverts the feature and > > makes it enabled by default, and included in all the feature bundles. > > > > Do we want to remove it from the 5.32 feature bundle, or is that too > > late in the development cycle? > > > > - ilmari > > > > [1]: https://github.com/Perl/perl5/pull/17186 > > [2]: https://github.com/Perl/perl5/pull/17477 > > -- > > - Twitter seems more influential [than blogs] in the 'gets reported in > > the mainstream press' sense at least. - Matt McLeod > > - That'd be because the content of a tweet is easier to condense down > > to a mainstream media article. - Calle Dybedahl >Thread Previous | Thread Next