develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from September 2019

Re: TONYC Grant Report August 2019

Thread Previous
From:
Marcus Holland-Moritz
Date:
September 15, 2019 12:12
Subject:
Re: TONYC Grant Report August 2019
Message ID:
20190915140649.0de23079@mate.mhxnet.de
+1, thanks Tony!



On 2019-09-13, at 11:21:42 +1000, Tony Cook wrote:

> Approximately 54 tickets were reviewed, and 9 patches were
> applied
> 
> [Hours]         [Activity]
>   0.13          #118551 track down fix and close
>   1.10          #124256 rebase, testing, apply to blead
>   0.12          #125096 re-check and close
>   1.73          #126991 work on a fix
>   0.72          #131136 track down fix and close, and for other Storable
>                 tickets too…
>   0.50          #131990 track down the fix and close
>   0.13          #131999 track down fix and close
>   1.26          #132777 review and some re-work, testing, apply to blead
>                 #132777 research and comment
>   0.68          #133695 re-test and apply to blead
>   0.33          #133878, #134269 make public
>   1.78          #133981 minor fix, testing, try to diagnose an unrelated
>                 porting test failure, comment
>   0.78          #134138 re-work patch and comment
>   1.39          #134171 testing
>                 #134171 research, comment
>                 #134171 research and comment
>   0.25          #134219 review and request more information
>                 #134219 review and merge into #134266
>   3.39          #134230 debugging, research, work on a fix
>                 #134230 work up a regression test, comment with patch
>                 #134230 testing, apply to blead
>   0.38          #134238 review and close
>   1.70          #134241 testing
>                 #134241 more testing
>   2.02          #134265 re-work supplied patches and comment
>                 #134265 re-test modified patch and apply to blead
>   3.04          #134266 work up a basic fix… which breaks tests
>                 #134266 work out problem, testing, comment with patch
>                 #134266 re-test and apply to blead
>   0.37          #134269 (sec) comment
>   0.17          #134270 merge into 134126
>   1.62          #134277 debugging
>   1.02          #134288 review, testing
>                 #134288 finish up, apply to blead
>   1.15          #134290 review and comment
>                 #134290 research, comment and close.
>   0.17          #134295 re-revert the exit(0) fix, since I didn’t make any
>                 progress in fixing the issues
>   1.12          #134312 research and comment
>                 #134312 research and comment some more
>   0.80          #134313 research and comment
>   0.50          #134320 review for proposal to backport, along with
>                 several other commits
>   4.72          #134325 debugging
>                 #134325 debugging, discussion with khw, comment
>                 #134325 debugging
>                 #134325 research, testing and comment
>   0.13          #134326 also fixed by khw’s 134329 fix, comment
>   0.10          #134327 also fixed by khw’s 134329 fix, comment
>   0.40          #134328 testing, try khw’s 134329 fix, comment
>   1.42          #134329 testing, start bisect
>   0.43          #134337 comment
>   1.88          #134349 work on understanding code, work up a test, fix
>   0.85          #134360 review, research, apply to blead, PR to metaconfig
>   0.40          #134361 comment
>                 #134361 research, follow-up
>   1.98          #134362 (sec) comment
>                 #134362 (sec) follow-up
>                 #134362 (sec) work on a fix
>                 #134362 (sec) testing, comment with patch
>   4.91          #134363 review and request more information
>                 #134363 research, fail to reproduce
>                 #134363 more research
>                 #134363 more research into gcc implementation
>                 #134363 more research, comment
>                 #134363 comment
>   0.37          #134365 review discussion
>                 #134365 comment with simple patch
>   1.37          #134369 (sec) research, testing, comment
>   0.62          #134380 review, test porting and apply to blead
>   3.82          #134383 (sec) debugging
>                 #134383 (sec) two tries to find a fix, comment with patch
>   1.38          #38920 review ticket (linked from 134349)
>                 #38920 try to work up a test case, testing
>   0.73          clean up some query security tickets (asking for info, not
>                 reporting issues)
>   0.22          comment on macros vs inline functions
>   0.90          coverity build and submit
>   2.17          mail list about coverity scan, more review coverity issues
>   0.75          more discussion with khw
>   0.97          Re-test coverity fix branch and apply to blead
>   0.52          regexp runtime limits: rebase, testing, push to server
>                 (not to blead), comment on a related security ticket
>   0.98          review coverity issues
>   0.93          review khw’s API list, discussion in #p5p
>   0.35          review khw’s function doc list
> ======
>  61.65 hours total
> 

Thread Previous


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About