On Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:34:32 -0700, ikegami@adaelis.com wrote: > Changing this means changing Scalar::Util::looks_like_number. Would that > break things? I agree that looks_like_number()also needs to be thought about. Perl's current behaviour is to issue the "isn't numeric" warning when "0xff"+0 is evaluated. However, I doubt that such a warning is valid now that "0xff" is numified to 255. It was certainly a valid warning when "0xff" numified to 0 ... but I'm thinking that warning should not be emitted for the current behaviour, and nor should looks_like_number("0xff") return FALSE. Cheers, Rob --- via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=134230Thread Previous | Thread Next