develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from June 2019

[perl #133967] Bleadperl v5.29.8-131-g2abbd513b breaksPERRAD/re-engine-Lua-0.17.tar.gz

Thread Previous
From:
Karl Williamson via RT
Date:
June 27, 2019 16:49
Subject:
[perl #133967] Bleadperl v5.29.8-131-g2abbd513b breaksPERRAD/re-engine-Lua-0.17.tar.gz
Message ID:
rt-4.0.24-30751-1561654174-205.133967-15-0@perl.org
On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 10:22:07 -0700, khw wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 09:08:15 -0700, jkeenan wrote:
> > On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 15:45:20 GMT, khw wrote:
> > > On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 08:41:20 -0700, jkeenan wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 24 Apr 2019 14:29:29 GMT, davem wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, Apr 07, 2019 at 04:41:34PM -0700, James E Keenan via RT
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > RURBAN/re-engine-PCRE2-0.14.tar.gz has a very similar test
> > > > > > > failure:
> > > > >
> > > > > Given that both these distributions have now had new releases
> > > > > which
> > > > > address the change in perl (variable-length look-behinds now
> > > > > supported),
> > > > > I propose that this ticket be closed.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I agree that re-engine-Lua now installs satisfactorily.
> > > >
> > > > However, I'm getting build-time errors with re-engine-PCRE2 on
> > > > Linux.
> > > > See cpanm build.log attached.
> > > >
> > > > On FreeBSD-11.2, I'm getting what appears to be an indefinite hang
> > > > in
> > > > the installation of Alien-Build-1.68, which is a prerequisite for
> > > > re-
> > > > engine-PCRE2.
> > > >
> > > > Thank you very much.
> > >
> > >
> > > Those sound so different from the topic of this ticket, that I think
> > > this should be closed and a new one(s) opened for them
> > 
> > I finally managed to get Alien::Build to install against blead on
> > FreeBSD-11.2.  I then used cpanm to try to install re::engine::PCRE2.
> > I got test failures.  But the module's maintainer has already filed a
> > github issue for these failures (https://github.com/rurban/re-engine-
> > PCRE2/issues/33), to which I just added data.  So I think
> > re::engine::PCRE2 has its own problems which need to be sorted out
> > before we can deem it a "pure" BBC situation.
> > 
> > Should this ticket be closed?  I won't object.  But at the very least
> > I feel that this ticket should no longer be a 5.30 blocker.
> > 
> > Thank you very much.
> > Jim Keenan
> 
> Removing from blockers list

I'm thinking this can now be closed.  Any objections?
-- 
Karl Williamson

---
via perlbug:  queue: perl5 status: open
https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=133967

Thread Previous


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About