Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from June 2019
Re: TONYC Grant Report May 2019
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next
From:
Sawyer X
Date:
June 20, 2019 19:50
Subject:
Re: TONYC Grant Report May 2019
Message ID:
CAMvkq_S0S=dKd=bgGHK15CgG+a-KSqifPzDr+HSo3bsgiwiD+Q@mail.gmail.com
+1!
Thank you, Tony!
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019, 23:05 Tony Cook <tony@develop-help.com> wrote:
> Approximately 30 tickets were reviewed, and 5 patches were
> applied
>
> [Hours] [Activity]
> 0.20 #121783 comment
> 7.98 #122112 re-work to save the pid instead of the fd
> #122112 more re-work, testing
> #122112 debugging, re-work differently
> #122112 work on a simpler fix
> #122112 more work on simpler fix, testing
> #122112 more testing, commit message, comment with patch
> #122112 re-test and apply to blead
> 0.55 #130585 rebase, testing, push to smoke branch
> 0.98 #132782 review, testing, comment (via #p5p, since RT is
> misbehaving)
> 0.89 #132964 comment
> #132964 oops, comment
> #132964 re-check, testing, apply to blead
> 2.73 #133850 rebase, test old patch, work on fixing the other
> cases
> #133850 more work on fixing other cases, comment with
> patch
> 2.30 #133958 discussion with khw, research, work on a fix,
> testing, write up a long commit message, comment with
> patch
> #133958 review smoke reports, comment
> #133958 re-test and apply patch
> 7.02 #134031 review discussion, testing, reproduce
> #134031 more testing, research
> #134031 discussion in #p5p, testing, some debugging
> #134031 more testing, discussion, research expected C math
> precision, freebsd bug reports
> 3.20 #134041 (sec) work on a fix
> #134041 (sec) work on a fix
> #134041 (sec) more work on a fix
> 0.47 #134046 review responses, rebase, retest, apply to blead
> 1.73 #134061 research and comment
> #134061 testing, fix a porting test failure, apply to
> blead
> 0.78 #134065 more debugging
> 13.90 #134072 debugging, comment
> #134072 debugging, research
> #134072 debugging
> #134072 debugging, work on a fix
> #134072 get test case working, try to make a test
> #134072 work out a test after some flailing around,
> testing
> #134072 track down a related issue (CVREF in stash instead
> of glob outside of main::, find it, comment with patch,
> add reference to experiment ticket
> 0.45 #134080 research, comment
> 3.99 #134111 debugging, research
> #134111 more research, comment
> 0.73 #134114 review patch, research
> 1.10 #134126 research, long comment
> 0.85 bug report with patch for re debug and uniprops
> 0.93 regexp runtime limits:
> 2.02 regexp runtime limits: and CPU limits
> 1.98 regexp runtime limits: don’t tie it to re.pm <sigh>,
> tests, documentation (needs some polish)
> 0.37 regexp runtime limits: exploring a maze of twisty macros
> 0.65 regexp runtime limits: look for a better way of handling
> the debug flag
> 0.98 regexp runtime limits: more efficiency, bang head against
> inconsistent naming
> 1.55 regexp runtime limits: research
> 2.30 regexp runtime limits: solve the macros, work on
> implementing limits
> 2.07 regexp runtime limits: try to work up a memory limit test
> case, side-trip into security issue discussion with khw,
> find a test case, work on efficiency
> 2.22 regexp runtime limits: work on memory limits
> 0.22 review #p5p discussion (about direction of perl)
> 0.27 Review maint backports
> ======
> 65.41 hours total
>
>
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next