On Fri, Jun 07, 2019 at 04:22:57PM -0500, Craig A. Berry wrote: > More likely, though, is > some change to the formatting or wording of nm output. Figuring out > the exact nm command libperl.t is running (using the Perl debugger as > James suggested) and then running it external to Perl and seeing what > its output looks like and how it might differ from what the test > expects might be the best place to start. Running the text script manually shows, on line 8, how nm was invoked: $ ./perl -Ilib t/porting/libperl.t # $^O = linux # $Config{archname} = x86_64-linux-thread-multi # $Config{cc} = cc # libperl = ../libperl.a # nm = /usr/bin/nm # nm_style = gnu # nm_opt = # command: "/usr/bin/nm ../libperl.a 2>libperl20767 |" ok 1 - has object pp.o .... -- All wight. I will give you one more chance. This time, I want to hear no Wubens. No Weginalds. No Wudolf the wed-nosed weindeers. -- Life of BrianThread Previous | Thread Next