On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 06:03:02PM +0100, Steve Hay via perl5-porters wrote: > On 10 May 2018 at 14:01, Steve Hay <steve.m.hay@googlemail.com> wrote: > > On 10 May 2018 at 10:29, Dave Mitchell <davem@iabyn.com> wrote: > >> On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 03:12:58PM +0100, Steve Hay via perl5-porters wrote: > >>> Now in blead in commit 4bd4e9335ffc257cbe2bf1a42789f693f5797337. > >>> > >>> (Actually, I'm still confused why Socket failed given that Windows > >>> doesn't compile cpan/ differently to dist/ and ext/, but I've spent > >>> too long staring at this now...) > >>> > >>> That just leaves the GCC fixes from bulk88 to deal with on this > >>> ticket. I'll look at them soon if nobody else gets there first. > >> > >> Are tou likely to be able to look at these? > >> > > > > Yes, I will do. Sorry for the delay. Not even being able to build in > > normal C mode with recent mingw.org compilers (RT#128631) hasn't > > helped, but I will go back to mingw-w64 compilers for these fixes. > > Finally tried this out, using MinGW-w64 compilers (6.3.0 and 7.1.0). I > tried x86 versions with and without USE_CPLUSPLUS and all is well. (I > thought MinGW 4.8.1 would work as well, but it has trouble with fstat > calls and is only happy in normal C mode - see perl #128631. I'm not > going to worry about that...) Should this work so far be applied in time for an -RC2? -- Dave's first rule of Opera: If something needs saying, say it: don't warble it.Thread Previous | Thread Next