Re: Why does blead say 5.28?

On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 3:40 PM, Sawyer X <xsawyerx@gmail.com> wrote:

> I made it 5.28 instead of 5.27.12 because we have no plans of releasing
> 5.27.12. I didn't want to confuse developers and tooling with 5.27.12
> which will not exist.
>
> I'm not sure it actually disrupts reports. Especially with Dave's comment.
>
> I'm sorry for the panic. I can change that if we find it necessary.
>
> On 04/25/2018 12:15 AM, Karl Williamson wrote:
> > $ blead -v
> >
> > This is perl 5, version 28, subversion 0 (v5.28.0
> > (v5.27.11-16-g71e845c342))
>

I believe there were discussions of being able to tag results as being for
'blead' with the commit hash indicated, which would make this issue moot.

-Dan

• Why does blead say 5.28? by Karl Williamson
• Re: Why does blead say 5.28? by Sawyer X
• Re: Why does blead say 5.28? by Dan Book
• Re: Why does blead say 5.28? by Karen Etheridge
• Re: Why does blead say 5.28? by Dave Mitchell
• Re: Why does blead say 5.28? by Curtis Jewell
• Re: Why does blead say 5.28? by Karen Etheridge
• Re: Why does blead say 5.28? by Karl Williamson
• Re: Why does blead say 5.28? by Tomasz Konojacki