Front page | perl.perl5.porters |
Postings from April 2018
> package DB {
> sub do_foo { print __PACKAGE__, "\n" }
> sub do_eval { print eval '__PACKAGE__', "\n" }
> }
> do_foo();
> do_eval();
>
> would output
> main
> DB
>
No. It would output:
DB
main
because inside do_foo the __PACKAGE__ is used without 'eval'
and inside do_eval '__PACKAGE__' is evaled in first non-DB
> what about errors and warnings within the eval? Would they appear to
> come
> from within the eval, or from the first non-DB caller.
I did not think about that, if expression is eval'ed at first non-DB caller thus
errors and warning should appear as from the first non-DB caller
probably using Current::Package::__ANON__[local/lib/perl5/Path/To/Module.pm:15] form
> f(eval $x, 1);
would it be reasonable eval_at/DB::eval_at?
---
via perlbug: queue: perl5 status: open
https://rt.perl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=133123
Thread Previous
|
Thread Next