On Sat, Dec 02, 2017 at 03:15:35PM +0000, Zefram wrote: > Andreas J. Koenig via RT wrote: > >A not very surprising BBC: > > Needs examination by Vincent. It's not surprising that a change > to B::Deparse would break some oversensitive test, but this one > doesn't look exactly like that. B::RecDeparse doesn't look like it > should be that sensitive, and the way the tests are failing is funny. > But B::RecDeparse's relationship to B::Deparse is quite convoluted, > and I can't readily see what's going on. I don't think this ticket should be a 5.28.0 blocker -- This is a great day for France! -- Nixon at Charles De Gaulle's funeralThread Previous | Thread Next