develooper Front page | perl.perl5.porters | Postings from April 2018

Re: [perl #132493] Bleadperl v5.27.5-387-g006c1a1dbd breaksRKINYON/DBM-Deep-2.0014.tar.gz

Thread Previous | Thread Next
From:
Sawyer X
Date:
April 20, 2018 10:56
Subject:
Re: [perl #132493] Bleadperl v5.27.5-387-g006c1a1dbd breaksRKINYON/DBM-Deep-2.0014.tar.gz
Message ID:
1a18f981-739b-1af2-2aea-35b8163d992a@gmail.com


On 04/20/2018 12:29 AM, Dave Mitchell wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 01:46:58PM -0800, Father Chrysostomos via RT wrote:
>> On Thu, 23 Nov 2017 13:08:23 -0800, andreas.koenig.7os6VVqR@franz.ak.mind.de wrote:
>>> bisect
>>> ------
>>> commit 006c1a1dbd541b84351332b0d315508f789f3bd1 (HEAD,
>>> refs/bisect/bad)
>>> Author: Zefram <zefram@fysh.org>
>>> Date:   Wed Nov 15 17:41:29 2017 +0000
>>>
>>> fix handling of registered warning categories
>>>
>>> diagnostics
>>> -----------
>>> http://www.cpantesters.org/cpan/report/20cd84d6-cb9d-11e7-a079-
>>> a334b34ff3ca
>>>
>>> Assignment of stale reference at t/39_singletons.t line 68.
>>> # Tests were run but no plan was declared and done_testing() was not
>>> seen.
>>> # Looks like your test exited with 255 just after 11.
>>> t/39_singletons.t ............... Dubious, test returned 255 (wstat
>>> 65280, 0xff00)
>>> All 11 subtests passed
>> I opened ticket #132468 for the purpose of creating an API that
>> DBM::Deep can use, so that it can be fixed permanently.  Currently
>> DBM::Deep delves inside warnings.pm internals.
> Since the API's now been done, and since it seems agreed that it's
> DBM::Dep that needs fixing, is it ok to close this ticket, or at least
> remove from the 5.28 blockers list?

Removing from 5.28 blockers list makes sense.

Thread Previous | Thread Next


nntp.perl.org: Perl Programming lists via nntp and http.
Comments to Ask Bjørn Hansen at ask@perl.org | Group listing | About